Sorry if I have missed that this has been discussed elsewhere.
What are your thoughts on the ZRL SBP system?
I like the idea, but think that it would be good if WTRL introduced a cut-off time for submitting teams, and have a penalty points system in place if a team puts through a swap after that cut-off time.
I think that people will get pretty disheartened if they think that they are competing against riders of a similar ability to them, only to see that change at the last minute.
Will these instances be rare or is it something that might impact the enjoyment of this new points scoring feature for lots of riders?
I don’t think there needs to be a cut off time, but there does need to be clear visible way to identify who is in your competition group once the race starts.
Right now WTRL site says this:
“You’ll need your wits about you to figure out who your rivals are to beat them.”
Wits are good, but a visual cue such as helmet color, jersey style, or a dot or number indicator on riders nearby list would be better (especially if riders can be substituted up to more or less the last minute). I think between the late signups and subs (which could be done for no reason, good reason, or tactical reasons) and the ability to change user display names on the fly (which again could be done for no reason, good reason, or tactical reasons), I think a visual cue to identify each group’s participants will be needed to not make this unnecessarily hard.
Right now I am on the disabled list and unable ride with my team, so I am planning to DS the mid and back section of the race for those whose SBP groups may have dropped off the front so they know who their competition is and where they are. (It’s hard for a racer to keep checking the updated SBP groups list as it auto updates and remember the names of six to eight of folks they just learned right before the race. Ideally they should be focused on their warmup and normal race prep.) Even with me attempting to do this, I think it will still be hard to manage and to the main tactic will just be to push as hard as you can in all segments. Will be interesting to see how it goes.
This whole system seems like way way way too much work for what accomplishes very little or nothing to make the race more interesting (compared to straight-up points for every position, anyway). I guess the real tactically interesting choice is if you put your best riders at the top or the bottom of the list.
When it comes to sprinting in a dense pack, it is basically impossible to identify and keep track of the individuals you are racing against no matter what, and even more so for a DS to do the same for a whole team at a time. And if your rivals are way up or down the road, there’s nothing to sprint for. So the only situation where this would actually potentially change racer behaviour in a meaningful way would be a situation where the pack is stretched out in a single file so you can actually see how you are positioned against typically one or max two your rivals and sprint (or not) accordingly.
I guess one could use the favourite function to make one’s rivals stand out a bit more on the minimap, at least if you are not using it for anything else (and you are both following each other or whatever it requires to use the thing in the first place).
Agree with much of this. As a result I will only be focusing on dropped riders from my team. I will try to let them know if there are other riders in their group who were also dropped and are nearby. If yes, sprint. If no, no change or wasted effort required.
Oh, ok, I thought the order was simply the team joining order and would stay constant for the duration of a season. (I do try to maintain an appropriate amount of ignorance about WTRL matters for health reasons.)
LOL, I guess… but it would give you something to sprint for. If you somehow know that one of your SBP rivals is up the road with the front group then you have less to fight for. Ultimately I still think this will favor the pointy end of the race and those riders already getting FAL points will just get more SBP’s, but we shall see next week.
i read through a whole ton of FB posts and from what i can tell, riders will be ranked on their historical segment performance in previous zrl races. while i think the idea is fundamentally overcomplicated, that would probably be the most least complicated way to do it fairly
i don’t have the appropriate PHD to think about it with any more depth than that. my condolences to everyone who manages a team
As captain of a D team that was at the bottom of the list in Americas West last round and will be at or near the bottom in Americas East this time (we’re new in 2022-23 and the West time wasn’t the best for either our Pacific folks or me on Eastern), that was my take on it as well. There may be occasions where we can pick up 2-3 extra points here or there, but I can’t imagine this will be a net gain for us, and since we struggled even to find 4 per race (we had to skip both TTTs) even if we get that fixed, this is more likely to help our opponents - depending on how it’s scored (it wasn’t clear to me), teams that can roll out 6 per race will get some (or a lot of) insurance points from this.
I appreciate what I think they were trying to do here, but I don’t think it’s going to do what they wanted.