Should Zwift Introduce Weight-Based Categories?
Zwift racing has long been dominated by watts per kilogram (w/kg) as the primary way to group riders into categories. While this makes sense for climbing, it often skews competition on flats and sprints—where raw power and aerodynamics matter more than w/kg alone.
What if Zwift introduced minimum weight categories for races? Similar to real-world cycling events like the Clydesdale (90kg+) and Athena (75kg+) divisions, these categories could create a fairer playing field for heavier riders who often struggle against lightweight climbers.
How Would It Work?
Instead of just A, B, C, and D categories, certain races could have minimum weight requirements:
Clydesdale (Men) – 90kg+
Athena (Women) – 75kg+
Additional weight bands (e.g., 75-90kg, 90-100kg, 100kg+) could be introduced for more balance.
Why This Could Improve Racing
Fairer Competition: Riders of similar weight would compete on a more level playing field.
More Strategy: Race dynamics would shift, making sprints and breakaways more competitive.
Encouraging Participation: Some riders avoid racing due to weight-related disadvantages—this could change that.
What do you think? Would you race in a weight-based category? Should Zwift experiment with this idea? 
