It’s very interesting to me how much discussion there is for this. I was expecting to log back on to 1 or 2 replies. I’ll chime in again to provide more thoughts.
I was, infact, riding with Constance. I didn’t want to mention this at first to see if people might bright up a certain pacerbot. From what I see the slower pacerbots you have riders infront and behind them at all times. Where I find this etiquette question to be relevant is only with the faster(est) pacer bots like Constance. So I guess my true question in this thread is “Should there be different etiquette/approach to riding with faster pacerbots?”
I think a thought experiment for this question could be this: If tomorrow Zwift removed the fastest bot, Genie (3.7 @75kg) would be the next fastest bot. Would it be poor etiquette to ride infront of Genie? How about the next day when they remove Genie as well. You get to a point where the question, in my opinion, is about the playerbase’s power distribution relative to the pacerbot. Similarly if everyone on zwift tomorrow gained 2w/kg on their FTP I don’t think riding infront of Constance would be such a big deal, even for an extended period of time.
However this is the current state of Zwift, the playerbase won’t all gain power tomorrow nor will Zwift start killing off robopacers. So I believe this phenomenon comes down to Zwift providing a “fastest” pace bot where a good chunk of riders can hang onto (at 3.4-3.8wkg roughly depending on weight) but less riders can ride at 4.2wkg for an extended period of time. So when there are 5 people who have been doing their 3.5wkg-ish rides on Constance every night at the same time and a rider who joins Constance wants to stretch their legs, those 5 riders get upset.
However imagine a scenario where there was 15 more people who joined Constance all riding at or slightly above Constance’s pace. Not to purposefully drop people, rather because this was their power target for the day. They could be pros who want to get an endurance ride in, or an amateur who wants to target their threshold and see how long they can do it for. Whatever their reason, 15 out of the now 20 riders will be infront of Constance. Those 5 original riders will definitely need to work harder. But now that a strong majority of riders in the group will be infront of the bot, you can start to see that at some point the mentality will shift of those original 5 riders. And it’s not as if those 5 riders can ask those 15 riders to join the A+ bot, which doesn’t exist, so why not have those riders ride with Genie, for example?
So I think it comes down to the basketball court dilemma. If you go to a basketball court with one net and you are there playing with one other friend and full basketball squad with team jerseys come along, you probably will give up the court to the larger group. However vise versa, the larger group probably won’t cut their game short to two people waiting on the sidelines. Riding infront of Constance where the vast majority of riders are using the bot to draft is kind of like the first basketball scenario- a small number of riders (could be 1) changing up the game for many.
Zwift could create a faster pace bot, they have in the past for special events, but the question is whether this would even be used or worth development time/maintence/cost.
I suppose my outcome to this discussion is that if a large share of riders are using a pacerbot in one way, it’s best to follow suit for good etiquette, even if there’s nothing stopping you. Although as a somewhat fast rider who enjoys riding with pacerbots, I do, perhaps selfishly, wish there was a 5.0 bot I could dance with.
Thanks all for your thoughts and input!