Dual recording, when?

MyWhoosh has it. TPV has it. I know you have the code ready for it

I’d like to see a native dual recording where one actually have to pair the trainer and a separate PM.

Not like now, were we see the same PM paired to zwift and their headunit…Or PM control their trainer. The fit file includes information of the PM, so it is easily done. If a trainer is PM controlled, it also sends out that information.

It is also fairly easy to autoflag for stickywatts.

It is so obvious when looking at many analysis at zwiftpower that many are done with the exact same PM or trainer. I’ve actually had far more variances in my data deliberately pairing same PM to both than what I see in zwiftpower.

As it is now, it is pretty worthless as a verification tool.

In the zwift analysis, the PM type and serial should be included, not typed in from user, but from fit file. The PM/trainer sends out this info.

I know you can do this, I know you’ve already looked into it, I just kinda wonder why we do not see it?

It is for racing. The ones saying, “but I’m just here using it as a training platform”, well…OK
So you don’t race, so it doesn’t concern you

I’d also like to see it on every virtual strava segment

I couldn’t agree more and WE as Organizers need way more info from racers equipment used.

Log File has plenty of information and it should be part of the Race Report for each individual.

1 Like

And for racers at a high level, no Zpower for them, at all.

No matter what, dual recording and only proper known reliable power/trainer devices. By chance I observed one such supposed top level racer cruising along past the Road to Sky starting point with his Zpower “trainer”.

2 Likes