High w/kg, bad results šŸ¤Ø

I agree with what you say, in principle. There are actually studies on RL climbers showing that being small and light is not enough in itself to beat the heavies uphill. It doesnā€™t provide enough of an advantage. Itā€™s being light in combination with excellent recovery, a certain profile, that is the key. They donā€™t just grind it out against the heavies in a climb, they torture them with tempo changes, accelerations, until the heavies canā€™t take it anymore.

But then you need to have excellent recovery to do what they (or you) are doing in the races and that doesnā€™t fall under ā€˜all else equalā€™. That falls under ā€˜deviant physiological profileā€™, to quote myself. Given an equal or similar fitness profile, the heavies will either hang in there or, more likely, you will be way too much on the limit to go for a push, let alone several.

Everyone knows it is more the 5 min performance that matters rather than the 20 min. Everyone who races frequently shift towards a punchier profile, if nothing else, if not intentionally, then by just racing. So getting better at recovery than the heavies is no easy thing. Iā€™m convinced most people who say thatā€™s what they did actually got a little genetic headstart. Because all else equal, the heavies will be just as good at recovery as you. Why wouldnā€™t they? Because of their weight? No.

But then there are these deviants, and maybe you are one. There is another light deviant in here, a rather vocal one, you know who, who mostly denies any disadvantage against heavies, or did so in the past anyway. Because he sprints the hell out of them. Light riders do have a faster acceleration, but then you need to back it up with raw Watts towards the latter part of the sprint or you will lack the terminal velocity for a win. But he can pull that off. He really can. Most light riders in Zwift wonā€™t be able to, though, not even if they switch training regimen. All else equal you donā€™t easily outsprint a guy with thighs twice the size of yours, thereā€™s just too much muscle to fight.

Now, you typically ā€˜senseā€™ the competitorsā€™ weights in a race, and a light rider will try to gauge the weights around them early in the race. Although this little in-race weigh-in also gets blurred by some people using some rather cheap and dodgy smart trainers, making their physics behave differently and a bit deceiving. But otherwise the heavies are usually a littleā€¦ heavyā€¦ in the small climbs (the climbs are generally small as we all know). And then they instead overtake you at the far foot of the hill, coming out of the descent like a cannonball, so the light rider canā€™t really rest downhill as much as others. But itā€™s kind of natural to a light rider to just keep going about as hard in the climb as on the flat right before, and that alone will strain the group a little, or at least it looks like it. Hah, you might think, get some! But part of it is just Newtonian physics. The heavies accelerate slower uphill. So itā€™s easy to fool yourself into thinking youā€™re doing damage. But then a few clicks before the finish comes the proverbial tempo increase. The heavies, especially the ones who donā€™t like to go orange throughout a race, the ones who race at a cozy pace, might not be anywhere near as exhausted as you might think. And thatā€™s where the light rider gets dropped.

1 Like

Thanks for taking the time to write all that. :smiley: Fortunately, I donā€™t care too much about the race results, nor will racing ever be the main thing I do on this app.

Iā€™m going to try my best with the 65kgs. :grin:

Since everyone is offering their knowledge. Can I ask another question?

Iā€™ve read about ā€œsticky wattsā€. Iā€™ve read some articles about it, but Iā€™m still not to sure about it.
I ride on my stages bike. Since I have only those 65kgs to work with, I have to fight to stay in a group relatively hard at times when others donā€™t have to do as much. So I tend to accelerate from time to time and then relax a bit, without stopping pedalling completely, but reducing my the cadence considerably. Often after losing my position in the field or when starting a climb.
My wattage is extremely unbalanced and I am now working on pedalling more regularly. Also because over time it becomes extremely exhausting to keep accelerating.
Would ā€œsticky wattsā€ be theoretically possible with the stages bike? I donā€™t think my watts stay up for three seconds every time I decrease the cadence. But Iā€™m still not entirely sure that Iā€™m not doing anything wrong that falsifies the performance.

Recommendation is to pair the power meters directly and not pair to the bike

And Calibrate PM before every Ride/Race it takes you less than a minute for that.

Itā€™s worth checking but my experience is that the PM calibration is completely stable. Basically nothing happens unless the trainer is faulty. If it hasnā€™t been calibrated frequently a few times itā€™s worth seeing if itā€™s out of spec or unstable.

Is that connecting PM directely to Zwift?

Yes you can pair the left side power meter to Zwift as the power source. Do not pair the right side power meter to Zwift - the left side will transmit for both sides. You have to wake up the power meter first, which isnā€™t necessary when you are pairing to the bike.