New Pricing Survey

This reminds me of Strava and we all know how that worked out!!

10 Likes

I totally agree Miles.
None of the cheaper options are what anyone really wants. So it’s like forcing us into a price rise. Which again, no one wants.
Has anyone got any good news?
Cheers. Oh and
“Ride Off”

6 Likes

Totally agree Daren. What a nightmare.

3 Likes

I only cycle - I will never ever run, and it’s vanishingly unlikely I would row.
I want structured training plans - for the grotty months when I know all my riding will be indoors.
I would like the chance to join all sorts of group rides and races… I thought the social/community side was the major aim of Zwift.

So none of those options would suit me at all. Lucky they’re only hypothetical…

Hmmm… Where was it spotted? Couldn’t find it on my Twitter feed…

It was shared in our team discord but was on Twitter originally. Eric commented that it was not a Zwift survey, but then that tweet was deleted.

I really don’t understand how unverified speculative rumours get some much attention on this (and other forums). This is clearly something that someone has knocked together outside of Zwift.

One thing is obvious and that is how much Zwift appreciates and values the community and their current subscibers. Eric always mentions this fact on any interviews, so putting a pricing structure like this together is not something Zwift would do.

The next logical pricing change would be to move running only to a paid service. Also add running to a combined service (+cycling) for a specific price and introduce rowing in to Beta. Cycling only subscriptions would likely remain as they are.

This would provide revenue increase from those using running only and the combined service. Add on the new Covid subscriber increase and i strongly expect that Zwift would be happy with the growth (subscriber & revenue) seen during 2020.

Think about it. :rofl:

1 Like

Tour de France wasn’t about the current subscribers (event-only for july), it was about the pros, marketing and charity. Rowing (should be here in a few weeks according to Eric) isn’t about current subscribers, it’s about a new market. Recent actions against WTRL and Zwiftpower’s developers aren’t about the community, at least not in it’s current form.

Anti-sandbagging, club functionality and a new UI would have been about current subscribers, but those features got delayed compared to promises no one forced them to make.

For me this isn’t first and foremost about pricing. It just shows the questions Zwift has to ask themselves. Do they want to compete with Peloton with spinning videos? Do they want to compete with other apps for workouts / training plans? Do they want to focus on (verified / Zwiftpower-based) eRacing? Do they want to focus on social group rides? Do they want to invest capacity into braking / steering functionality? Or all of the above at once risking that nothing is perfect?

The survey, whoever did it, is asking those questions big parts of the community, from eRacers to people more interested in workouts and group rides, are talking about. So no wonder it gets attention in light of those questions. And those questions are getting asked because Zwift isn’t answering them in a consistent way so far.

6 Likes

Which is why I’ve posted it here, on the official forum, to ask Zwift for comment and/or verification or otherwise.

9 Likes

None of those suit me. They don’t have a combination listed that I would want. This would drive me to other platforms, not even considering prices.

Also, don’t want a one year commitment. I like my outside riding in many months and don’t want to pay for something I don’t use.

However, I do look forward to rowing, braking, and more steering. I’m also interested in instructor-led workouts as long as they have zwift controlling my resistance. Don’t want to lose text workouts!

If they’re going to do this, they should do cafeteria style of a base like it is now, and then pick and choose add-ons like special worlds, braking, more steering, rowing, instructor-led workouts, advanced analytics, etc.

There were other combinations that I’ve seen screenshotted elsewhere. I don’t think any of them are intended to be real actual scenarios, I reckon it’s going to be fed into some algorithm that produces charts and diagrams of what features people would value the most. Presumably to inform resource investment decisions.

3 Likes

I got it emailed to me today from Zwift. There were 8 pages of choices like the one above. None of them seemed like an improvement I’d be willing to pay for…

2 Likes

And create anxiety in subscribers? Who at Zwift thought it was a smart idea to run a 100% price increase up the flag pole?

I see on reddit people are talking about receiving this survey so it seems like it might be an official survey from Zwift unless someone at Zwift would like to inform us otherwise.

6 Likes

agree with above posts. i went through the 8 pages (each with 3 pricing options=24 total) and none of them looked like what i wanted. were they randomly put together? you have to choose your favorite of each group of 3 (none really looked good) and then answer “would you pay for this option?” to which i answered “no” to almost all i think. looks like they were trying to create a matrix of what is important to people. pricing ranged from 9$ -40$ a month i think. in the free text spot i told them not to make the strava mistake by taking away functionality! hopefully this means they are looking for feedback before any big changes

4 Likes

I got an email today with this info. A link to a survey with questions and these “packages”

1 Like

Same here. Guess it’s legit.

3 Likes

I would have thought/hoped that it would be best to keep it simple.
There is a Zwift Cycling package ie the one we already have and at some point a consumer would have to pay for the Zwift Running package. With a Zwift Rowing package to be paid for about 2 years down the line.
Why mess it all up?

1 Like

Where’s the Running only option?

1 Like

Billed annually… Yikes. If that’s legit I’m cancelling for certain.

1 Like